few weeks ago, Laura Revuelta, ABC art critic, to talk of change for the MUSAC in recent times, and wanting to make an example Proforma project conducted at the institution, stated: " As an example, the project is worth marking this turn of three hundred sixty degrees, Proforma, which occupied its rooms in the first months of this year" (http:// www.abc.es/20100701/cultura/culturalarte-201007011708.html) . How? A three hundred sixty degree rotation? Did he say that MUSAC always does the same thing? Give a 360 º, as usually learn in school, stay one as it was. It is just one example. But in many ways that turn 360 degrees we see every week in the cultural supplements. Say the same thing without saying anything. Back on the same, with the same words. I insist, is just one example. Here's another. Recently (ABC cultural, July 31, 2010, p. 27), again, Laura Revuelta spoke of one of the spaces, just closed, the latest edition of Artesantander, a fair that begins to detach a certain aura of staleness dyeing, as a thick layer of dandruff, earlier editions. The space has spoken Laura Revuleta is curated by another critic, Oscar Alonso Molina, within the fair. titled Storytelling , the critic try stopping a number of projects of different interest. The pieces of Regina Miguel, Anne Lisse Coste, Juan Carlos Bracho, Jesus Zurita, Nati Bermejo, Philipp Fröhlich and Kristoffer Arden. The strange thing is when he talks about the work of the latter (with the gallery Oliva Arauna). His work Walk in My Shoes shows a series of running shoes scattered chaotically on the floor. This is supposedly the shoes with which the artist has pulled miles. " Inside soybeans planted with the desire to flourish. In fact it seems a rather uninteresting work and establish a more vacuous speeches about media quite kitsch. The funny thing is not the work but the assignment of values \u200b\u200blyric by the criticism. He writes: "The lyrics of Kristoffer Arden (this artist is always lyrical discourse catch him hard though he insists on not wanting to tell) is summarized in a lot of shoes with which the artist has pulled miles inside which has planted about soybeans. " Consider the concept of lyricism. Do you lyric and poetry of this piece is that "costs catch you speaking? How so? Moreover, his lyricism, he says, lies in a shoe used as container. That is the poetry and lyricism as criticism. "The lyricism is when one speaks of himself and gives no clues? Too simple and too cheat, I think. Does not have any idea of \u200b\u200bthe work is its lyrical factor? It seems that when art critics do not know what to say of a work or whether this work are some symbols or elements of earthquakes, land, plant, or some mysterious-sounding words (or corny, which is unusual, or tragic or mysterious Celan type) then comes the expression "poetic," "lyrical," as if this shift is filled with some kind of gap both artistically and in the criticism. Or worse, the saving of the work. That is, the absence of concepts seems to affect more and more, both critics and the creation, although in the first the issue is urgent and pathetic and, in some cases.
0 comments:
Post a Comment